Negative Gearing Explained Australia 2025: Complete Guide with Examples
IntuitiveCalc Team
Financial Content Specialist
Negative gearing is one of Australia's most discussed investment strategies, allowing property and share investors to offset investment losses against their personal income. This comprehensive guide explains exactly how negative gearing works, who benefits most, and whether it's the right strategy for your financial situation in 2025.
Quick Summary: Negative Gearing at a Glance
- What it is: When investment expenses exceed investment income, creating a loss
- Tax benefit: Loss can be deducted from your salary/wages, reducing tax
- Who uses it: Property investors (most common), share investors
- Tax saving: Up to 45 cents per dollar of loss (for highest earners)
- Important: You still lose money overall - tax refund only covers part of the loss
What is Negative Gearing?
Negative gearing occurs when the costs of owning an investment exceed the income it generates. In simple terms, you're spending more money on your investment than you're receiving from it.
The key feature of Australia's tax system is that this investment loss can be offset against your other income sources, such as your salary. This reduces your taxable income and therefore your tax bill.
The Three Types of Gearing
| Type | Definition | Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Negative Gearing | Expenses exceed income | Losing money |
| Neutral Gearing | Expenses equal income | Breaking even |
| Positive Gearing | Income exceeds expenses | Making profit |
How Negative Gearing Works: Step-by-Step
Let's walk through exactly how negative gearing creates tax benefits using a practical example.
Step 1: Calculate Your Investment Loss
First, add up all your investment income and subtract all expenses:
Example: $600,000 Investment Property
| Rental Income | |
| Weekly rent: $550 x 52 weeks | +$28,600 |
| Expenses | |
| Loan interest (6.5% on $540,000) | -$35,100 |
| Property management (7.5%) | -$2,145 |
| Council rates | -$1,800 |
| Water rates | -$900 |
| Landlord insurance | -$1,500 |
| Repairs & maintenance | -$2,000 |
| Depreciation (building + fixtures) | -$9,500 |
| Other (strata, legal, etc.) | -$1,200 |
| Total Expenses | -$54,145 |
| Net Rental Loss | -$25,545 |
Step 2: Offset Against Your Income
This $25,545 loss is deducted from your taxable income:
Tax Calculation Example
| Your annual salary | $120,000 |
| Rental property loss | -$25,545 |
| Taxable income | $94,455 |
| Tax without property (on $120,000) | $29,188 + Medicare |
| Tax with property (on $94,455) | $20,888 + Medicare |
| Annual Tax Saving | $8,300 |
Note: Your marginal tax rate (32.5% in this example) determines how much tax you save per dollar of loss.
Step 3: Calculate Your Actual Cash Position
It's crucial to understand the difference between your paper loss and actual cash loss:
Cash Flow vs Paper Loss
| Paper Loss (for tax purposes) | |
| Total rental loss | -$25,545 |
| Actual Cash Loss | |
| Paper loss | -$25,545 |
| Add back depreciation (non-cash) | +$9,500 |
| Actual Cash Loss | -$16,045 |
| Tax refund received | +$8,300 |
| Net Out-of-Pocket Cost | -$7,745/year |
Important Reality Check
Even with negative gearing, you're still losing money! In this example, you're paying $7,745 out of pocket each year. The tax system subsidises your loss, but it doesn't eliminate it. You need capital growth (property value increase) to make this strategy profitable overall.
Positive vs Negative Gearing: Which is Better?
This is one of the most debated questions in property investing. Let's compare both strategies:
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Factor | Negative Gearing | Positive Gearing |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow | Costs you money | Puts money in pocket |
| Tax impact | Reduces taxable income | Increases taxable income |
| Best for | High income earners | Lower income earners |
| Growth focus | Capital growth markets | Rental yield markets |
| Risk level | Higher (relies on growth) | Lower (immediate returns) |
| Property type | Inner city, high demand | Regional, high yield |
| Scaling ability | Limited by income | Self-funding growth |
When Negative Gearing Makes Sense
- You're in a high tax bracket (37% or 45%)
- You expect strong capital growth (5%+ annually)
- You have stable, secure employment
- You have cash reserves for emergencies
- You're building long-term wealth (10+ year horizon)
When Positive Gearing Makes Sense
- You're in a lower tax bracket (19% or 32.5%)
- You want passive income now
- You're approaching retirement
- You want to build a larger portfolio faster
- You're risk-averse
Who Benefits Most from Negative Gearing?
The tax benefit of negative gearing depends entirely on your marginal tax rate:
Tax Savings by Income Level (2024-25)
| Taxable Income | Marginal Rate | Tax Saved per $10,000 Loss |
|---|---|---|
| $0 - $18,200 | 0% | $0 |
| $18,201 - $45,000 | 19% | $1,900 |
| $45,001 - $135,000 | 32.5% | $3,250 |
| $135,001 - $190,000 | 37% | $3,700 |
| $190,001+ | 45% | $4,500 |
Plus 2% Medicare levy. High income earners get the biggest tax benefit.
Key Insight
Someone earning $200,000 saves $4,500 per $10,000 loss, while someone earning $40,000 saves only $1,900. This is why negative gearing is primarily a strategy for higher income earners.
Real-World Scenarios: Three Investor Profiles
Scenario 1: High Income Professional
Profile: Sarah, 35, surgeon earning $350,000/year
| Property value | $900,000 |
| Loan (90% LVR) | $810,000 |
| Annual rental loss | -$35,000 |
| Tax saved (45% + 2% Medicare) | +$16,450 |
| Depreciation (non-cash expense) | +$14,000 |
| Net out-of-pocket cost | -$4,550/year |
Result: Sarah holds a $900k property for just $87/week. If property grows 5% annually, she gains $45,000 in equity vs $4,550 cost = excellent return.
Scenario 2: Middle Income Worker
Profile: Mike, 42, tradesperson earning $85,000/year
| Property value | $550,000 |
| Loan (85% LVR) | $467,500 |
| Annual rental loss | -$18,000 |
| Tax saved (32.5% + 2% Medicare) | +$6,210 |
| Depreciation (non-cash) | +$8,000 |
| Net out-of-pocket cost | -$3,790/year |
Result: Mike pays $73/week to hold this property. The lower tax benefit means he needs stronger capital growth to make it worthwhile.
Scenario 3: Lower Income Earner
Profile: Lisa, 28, retail worker earning $50,000/year
| Property value | $400,000 |
| Loan (90% LVR) | $360,000 |
| Annual rental loss | -$12,000 |
| Tax saved (32.5% drops to 19%) | +$3,100 |
| Depreciation (non-cash) | +$6,000 |
| Net out-of-pocket cost | -$2,900/year |
Result: Lisa pays $56/week but gets minimal tax benefit. A positively geared property in a regional area might serve her better.
What Expenses Create Negative Gearing?
Understanding which expenses are deductible helps you maximise your tax position:
1. Loan Interest (Largest Deduction)
Interest on investment loans is typically your biggest deduction. With current rates around 6-7%, a $500,000 loan generates $30,000-$35,000 in interest deductions annually.
2. Depreciation (Paper Deduction)
Depreciation is unique because it's a deduction without actual cash outlay. There are two types:
- Building depreciation: 2.5% of construction cost per year (buildings post-1987)
- Plant and equipment: Appliances, carpets, blinds, air conditioning
Depreciation Example
A 5-year-old apartment with $350,000 building value:
- Building depreciation: $350,000 x 2.5% = $8,750/year
- Plant & equipment (year 1): $5,000-$12,000
- Total depreciation deduction: $13,750-$20,750
This is "free" money off your taxable income with no cash outlay.
3. Property Management Fees
- Ongoing management: 6-8% of rent plus GST
- Letting fees: 1-2 weeks rent for new tenants
- Advertising costs
4. Rates and Insurance
- Council rates: $1,500-$3,000/year
- Water rates: $800-$1,500/year
- Landlord insurance: $1,000-$2,000/year
- Strata fees (units): $2,000-$8,000/year
5. Repairs and Maintenance
- Fixing broken items (immediate deduction)
- Replacing like-for-like (immediate deduction)
- General maintenance and upkeep
6. Other Deductions
- Land tax
- Pest control
- Gardening/lawn maintenance
- Bank fees and charges
- Accounting fees
- Legal costs (tenant disputes)
- Travel for inspections (limited)
Negative Gearing for Shares
Negative gearing isn't just for property - you can also negatively gear shares:
Share Negative Gearing Example
| Margin loan | $100,000 |
| Interest rate | 7.5% |
| Annual interest cost | -$7,500 |
| Dividends received (4% yield) | +$4,000 |
| Net loss | -$3,500 |
| Tax saved (37% rate) | +$1,295 |
Shares vs Property for Negative Gearing
| Factor | Property | Shares |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation | Yes (major benefit) | No |
| Leverage available | Up to 90% LVR | 50-70% typically |
| Liquidity | Low (months to sell) | High (instant) |
| Franking credits | No | Yes |
| Margin calls | No | Yes (major risk) |
Risks and Downsides of Negative Gearing
Critical Risks to Consider
1. Property Values Can Fall
If your property drops in value, you're losing money on both fronts - negative cash flow AND capital loss. You need long-term growth to make negative gearing work.
2. Interest Rates Can Rise
Higher rates increase your losses. A 2% rate increase on a $500,000 loan adds $10,000/year to your costs. Can you afford it?
3. Vacancy Periods
No rent during vacancy means you bear 100% of costs. Extended vacancies can be devastating to cash flow.
4. Income Changes
Losing your job or income reduction makes negative gearing unsustainable. You need stable income to fund the losses.
5. CGT on Sale
When you sell, capital gains are added to your taxable income. After years of losses, you might face a significant tax bill.
The Break-Even Calculation
To determine if negative gearing is worthwhile, calculate your break-even capital growth rate:
Break-Even Analysis
| Annual out-of-pocket cost (after tax) | $7,745 |
| Property value | $600,000 |
| Required growth to break even | 1.29%/year |
Formula: Out-of-pocket cost / Property value x 100
When Negative Gearing Doesn't Make Sense
Negative gearing is NOT suitable for everyone. Avoid it if:
- You're on a low income (under $50,000): Tax savings are minimal
- You have no emergency fund: Can't handle unexpected costs
- Job security is uncertain: Need stable income to fund losses
- You're approaching retirement: Less time for capital growth
- You need cash flow now: Negative gearing drains money
- You can't handle volatility: Property markets fluctuate
- You're buying in low-growth areas: Capital growth is essential
Red Flag Warning Signs
- Promoters promising "free" property through tax benefits
- Pressure to buy without proper due diligence
- Off-the-plan properties in oversupplied areas
- Projections showing unrealistic capital growth
- Anyone suggesting you can "make money by losing money"
The Future of Negative Gearing in Australia
Negative gearing has been a political hot topic for decades. Here's the current landscape:
Current Policy (2025)
As of January 2025, negative gearing remains fully available for all residential investment properties, both new and existing. There are no caps on the amount of losses that can be claimed.
Previous Reform Proposals
- 2019 Labor Policy: Proposed limiting negative gearing to new properties only (defeated at election)
- Grandfathering: Existing investors would keep current arrangements
- CGT discount reduction: Often discussed alongside negative gearing changes
What Could Change?
Potential Future Reforms
| Reform Option | Impact | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
| New properties only | Existing investors unaffected | Medium |
| Annual loss cap | Limits tax deduction amount | Medium |
| CGT discount to 25% | Reduces capital gains benefit | Medium |
| Complete abolition | Major market impact | Low |
Planning Ahead
While negative gearing is secure for now, wise investors plan for potential changes. Don't build an investment strategy that relies entirely on negative gearing benefits. Focus on fundamentals: quality properties in growth locations with good rental demand.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between negative gearing and capital gains?
Negative gearing is about annual cash flow (income vs expenses), while capital gains refer to the profit when you sell. You can be negatively geared annually but still make a profit overall through capital growth when you sell.
Can I negatively gear my home?
No. Negative gearing only applies to investment properties. Your primary residence is not an income-producing asset, so no deductions are available for mortgage interest or other costs.
Do I need to pay back the tax refund if I sell?
No, tax refunds from negative gearing are yours to keep. However, when you sell, you'll pay Capital Gains Tax on any profit, which partially "claws back" some of the tax benefit - particularly regarding depreciation claimed.
How do I claim negative gearing on my tax return?
Complete the rental property section of your tax return (or use a tax agent). You'll need records of all rental income, expenses, and a depreciation schedule from a quantity surveyor.
Is negative gearing worth it in 2025?
It depends on your personal circumstances - income level, property location, and investment goals. For high-income earners buying in growth markets, it can be effective. For lower income earners, positive gearing may be more appropriate.
What happens if my property becomes positively geared?
This is actually a good thing! It means your rental income now exceeds expenses, so you're making money. You'll pay tax on the profit, but you're building wealth without the cash drain.
Can I negatively gear multiple properties?
Yes, you can negatively gear as many properties as you can financially support. All losses are combined and offset against your other income. However, banks will consider your serviceability when lending for additional properties.
Key Takeaways
- Negative gearing offsets investment losses against your income, reducing tax
- Higher income earners benefit most (up to 47c per dollar of loss)
- You still lose money - the tax refund only covers part of your loss
- Capital growth is essential to make negative gearing profitable
- Depreciation is a major non-cash deduction (get a quantity surveyor report)
- Not suitable for low income earners, unstable employment, or those needing cash flow
- Policy changes are possible - don't rely entirely on tax benefits
- Consider positive gearing if you need income now or have lower tax rates